Saturday, September 25, 2021

 


Alarm Fatigue

It’s the beginning of a registered nurse’s twelve-hour shift, she holds her coffee in hand and receives bedside report on her pediatric patients. As the off going nurse is providing details of the patient’s day, the telemetry pager has paged a tachycardia alert for one of their patients three times in just a few minutes. The dayshift nurse silences the pager and without skipping a beat, she explains that the alarm has been going off non-stop and it had driven her completely crazy for a few hours. The on-coming nurse responds, “how does the patient look, is the monitor reading accurately?” The off-going nurses sighs, “he’s fine, totally fine.” But is he fine?

The Problem:

o   Alarm fatigue is a concerning problem in nursing when nursing staff is too overloaded with various alarms, beeps, and dings that they become desensitized and fail to respond to essential clinical alarms. Failure to acknowledge alarms has a direct negative impact on patient safety (Weeks et al., 2021).

o   Utilization of clinical alarm safety was implemented to increase patient safety and improve patient outcomes; however, it appears that alarm fatigue is actually creating an increased risk for patient harm (Short & Chung, 2019).

o   The Joint Commission (TJC) established National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) in the early 2000’s (The Joint Commission, 2021). One of the initial NPSG’s was to address the use of clinical alarms, assessing usability and audibility of alarms. The original Clinical Alarm Safety goal was retired in 2005 with the belief that alarms were being adequately used and had no link to negative patient outcomes (The Joint Commission, 2021).

o   TJC (2021) had to reprioritize alarm safety after its Sentinel Event report identified 98 reports of patient alarm events, resulting in 80 patient deaths between 2009-2012. 

o   The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had reported 566 patient safety alarm related deaths over the course of five years beginning in January 2005 (The Joint Commission, 2021).

o   An Alarm Summit held in 2011 revealed that clinical alarm safety needed to be improved upon. TJC reported that of the 1,600 organizations that completed a clinical alarm safety assessment 1,440 felt that immediate action needed to be taken to overcome the challenges facing clinical alarm safety risks (The Joint Commission, 2021).

Proposed Intervention

o   In 2014 the Joint Commission issued new NPSG’s instructing hospitals to implement a plan indicating the policies and procedures the organization would use of alarm system safety (Short & Chung, 2019).

o   Short and Chung (2019) explained that the most common form of monitoring in hospitals is cardiac monitoring via continuous electrocardiography leads. The leads monitor heart rate, cardiac rhythm, and respiratory rate that is transmitted to a central monitoring station.

o   Alarm parameters can be customized to the patient and any deviations from the parameters will produce an audible alarm to a pager that the nurse carries. The challenges facing this solution is that nurses report the pagers do not work, are not replaced when broken, and often feel the alarms are not accurately reading the patients vital signs.

o   The never-ending beeping ends up creating frustration and fatigue for the nurse. The pager then, ends up being left at the nurse’s station and is ignored.

Recommendations for Improvement

            As healthcare technology improves, hospitals must assess current approaches to problems and evaluate if newer technology could be used as a solution to bring positive impact to patient care and safety. Three key interventions can help alleviate alarm fatigue.

1. Properly prepare patient skin for electrodes, change electrodes daily and maintain equipment in safe working order.

2. Minimize inconsequential alarms: modifying the alarm threshold for cardiac and respiratory alarms. Setting alarm limits to critical criteria customized to individual patients can allow accuracy with alarming and increase responsiveness by the nurse. Alarm protocols can identify who can make the decisions regarding parameters. The Joint Commission (2021) identified important questions and procedures to consider when alarm protocols are designed:

·       When alarm signals can be disabled?

·       When alarm parameters can be changed?

·       Who in the organization has the authority to set and/or change alarm parameters?

·       Who in the organization has the authority to set alarm parameters to off?

·       Who will be monitoring and responding to alarm signals?

·       Who will be checking individual alarm signals for accurate settings, proper operation, and detectability?

3. Implementation of a multidimensional smartphone app. The healthcare app would use data collected by a telemetry system, processed by software, and sent to a smartphone app that would allow the nurse to see data triggering alarm, as well as real time information from the patient’s monitor to include vital signs, and analysis of cardiac rhythm. The nurse can acknowledge the alert and proceed to the patient’s bedside to respond. With the app, the nurse can forward the data to the correct physician or alert resuscitation teams (code blue teams) if warranted (Short & Chung, 2019). In addition to smartphone apps, additional measures of motion detection can be utilized by incorporating sensors in patient’s rooms. For example, if app triggers an alarm for bradycardia, a motion detector sensor in the patient room will conduct an automatic scan of the patient to assess activity level. The motion detector sensor transmits data to the app that indicates a green, yellow, or red alert based on level of patient activity. A red alert would be indicative of no movement, thus warranting an emergent response. Combination use of smartphone apps and motion detector sensing would allow the software to triage the alarms and allow the nurse the ability to prioritize the alarm response needed and reduce the delay in treatment for life threatening alarm notifications.

Benefit to Nursing

o   The average nurse experiences just under 200 dings, beeps, or chimes from alarm notifications in one twelve-hour shift (Gorisek et al., 2021).

o   Gorisek et al. (2021) explained that up to 90% of alarms are false notifications and may not require intervention. The remaining portion of triggered alarms are often emergent and require a critical response.

o   Using software or technology that can triage alarms and prioritize the need for a nurse’s attention may reduce the quantity of alarms nurses receive each shift.

o   With fewer false alarms and distractions they may bring the nurse can increase awareness and responsiveness to clinical alarms that do warrant immediate attention.

o   Decreasing false alarms is also believed to decrease stress and improve workflow for nurses (Gorisek et al., 2021).

o   Reduction of unnecessary alarms also allows the nurse to focus on delivering high quality, safe, and competent care (Weeks et al., 2021).

Benefit to Patients

o   The number one benefit to the patient is improved patient safety. Timely responsiveness to critical alarms by nurses improves patient outcomes, decreases adverse events, and can be lifesaving (Pelter & Drew, 2015).

o   Aside from the major benefits, decreasing false alarms reduces noise irritation and overall disruption of rest for patients and family.

Conclusion

            Effectively monitoring patients is an important component in delivering safe care. Nurses never intended to ignore or becoming desensitized to critical alarms. Nurses became inundated by the many alarms that occur in the hospital setting. After responding numerous times to false alarms, the mindset shifted that any beeping heard was ultimately a fake alarm. The harm comes into play when a critical alarm occurs that leads to cardiac arrest and response time is delayed. Implementing better practices of maintaining equipment, using alarm protocols, and integrating technology through smartphone apps could resolve the crisis of alarm fatigue in nursing.  

 


 

References

Gorisek, R., Mayer, C., Hicks, W. B., & Barnes, J. (2021). An Evidence-Based Initiative to Reduce Alarm Fatigue in a Burn Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Nurse41(4), 29–37. https://doi-org.ju.idm.oclc.org/10.4037/ccn2021166

Pelter, M. M., & Drew, B. J. (2015, December 1). Harm from alarm fatigue. PSNet. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/harm-alarm-fatigue

Short, K. & Chung, Y. (2019). Solving alarm fatigue with smartphone technology. Nursing, 49 (1), 52-57. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000549728.37810.d9

The Joint Commission. (2021). Alarm System Safety. Leading the Way to Zero. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/r3-reports/r3_report_issue_5_12_2_13_final.pdf

Weeks, K., Timalonis, J. & Donovan, L. (2021). Does alarm fatigue start in nursing school?. Nursing, 51 (5), 59-63. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000743284.73649.7a.